王 峰. 道德相对化批判[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2014, (9): 110-113. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.025
引用本文: 王 峰. 道德相对化批判[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2014, (9): 110-113.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.025
WANG Feng. Criticism on Moral Relativity[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2014, (9): 110-113. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.025
Citation: WANG Feng. Criticism on Moral Relativity[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2014, (9): 110-113.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.025

道德相对化批判

Criticism on Moral Relativity

  • 摘要:道德相对主义说明道德具有特殊性、相对性,却不能否认道德具有普遍性、绝对性。道德相对主义不利于青少年的道德教育,对优秀传统文化带来毁灭性的打击并使道德走向价值虚无的困境。道德情景具有客观性、道德主体具有共同性,这为重建道德共识提供了可能。道德最终要有确定性,但确定性不等同于绝对性,人类应在道德相对主义和道德绝对主义之间保持张力。

    Abstract:The ethical relativism shows that moral has its own particularity and relativity, but it does not deny the universality and absoluteness of moral. Such relativism is not good to the moral education to minors and might bring destruction to the traditional excellent culture. This might lead to the value nihility of moral. The fact that the moral situation is object but its subject is subjective provides the possibility for the moral reconstruction. Moral eventually has its own certainty which is not the same as absoluteness. Human should keep the balance between the moral relativism and absolutism.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map