郑 凯 歌. 论《古文渊鉴》体制“权舆于六籍”[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2014, (11): 80-84. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.11.015
引用本文: 郑 凯 歌. 论《古文渊鉴》体制“权舆于六籍”[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2014, (11): 80-84.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.11.015
ZHENG Kai-ge. On Genres of An Insight into the Ancient Essays Originated from Six Classic Books[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2014, (11): 80-84. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.11.015
Citation: ZHENG Kai-ge. On Genres of An Insight into the Ancient Essays Originated from Six Classic Books[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2014, (11): 80-84.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.11.015

论《古文渊鉴》体制“权舆于六籍”

On Genres of An Insight into the Ancient Essays Originated from Six Classic Books

  • 摘要:《古文渊鉴》是清初一部大型古文选本,选文自《左传》至两宋,共计1365篇。《序》中指出古文体制“靡不根柢于群经,权舆于六籍”,属于我国传统文学批评“文本于经”的范畴。考查《古文渊鉴》的体制与内容,我们发现其“尊经”更多地是从内容和功用方面,而非文体方面。其以“经”为径,“明道”为旨,“致用”是目的。这对于我们更深刻地理解《古文渊鉴》和“文本于经”的内涵都具有积极的促进作用。

    Abstract:The work An Insight into the Ancient Essays was a large selection of ancient essays in early Qing Dynasty. It has 1,365 articles selected fromThe Spring and Autumn Annals by ZUO Qiu-ming to those in Song Dynasties. Its preface has pointed out that the genres started from six classic books and they belong to the traditional Chinese literary critics which holds that articles originated from classic works. When examining the genres and content of An Insight into Ancient Essays, we find that we respect such classic works in more terms of their content and functions instead of styles. They take “classic” as means, “understanding of truth ” as the principle, and “application” as final goal. This is of a great help for our deeper understanding of the book and the connotation of “articles originating from classic works”.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map