陈 勇. 论语文教学中的“练”和“导”[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2015, (1): 115-118. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.01.024
引用本文: 陈 勇. 论语文教学中的“练”和“导”[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2015, (1): 115-118.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.01.024
CHEN Yong. On “Practicing” and “Guiding” in Chinese Teaching[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2015, (1): 115-118. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.01.024
Citation: CHEN Yong. On “Practicing” and “Guiding” in Chinese Teaching[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2015, (1): 115-118.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.01.024

论语文教学中的“练”和“导”

On “Practicing” and “Guiding” in Chinese Teaching

  • 摘要:重“练”行“导”是成功语文教学范例的重要特征,语文教学应该倡导“导练”范式。从“导”和“练”的内涵看,“导”和“练”都具有方法论的意义,是语文“教”和“学”的主要方式。语文教学中,“练”为主线,“导”为“练”服务,“导”“练”有机结合,凸显了教师和学生各自的主体性,又使他们互为主客体。“导练”要有效,需避免题海战术、追新逐异、不讲科学、撒手放羊、“导”而无方等误区。

    Abstract:The successful Chinese teaching is characterized by emphasis on the paradigm of action, practice and guidance, among which the last two should be advocated in such teaching. From the connotation of guidance and practice, they are significant in methodology, and are the two main ways of the teaching, in which practice serves as the main line, guidance serves for practice. The two are united, which highlights the subjectivity of both students and teachers, and meanwhile, the objects of each other. The effective guidance and practice should avoid the exercise-oriented strategy, pursuit for anything new or different, indulgence and incorrect guidance.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map