周钧韬. 魏子云《金瓶梅》研究的成就与失误[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2015, (7): 8-14. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.07.003
引用本文: 周钧韬. 魏子云《金瓶梅》研究的成就与失误[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2015, (7): 8-14.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.07.003
ZHOU Jun-tao. On Fruits and Flaws of WEI Zi-yun's Studes of Chin Ping Mei[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2015, (7): 8-14. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.07.003
Citation: ZHOU Jun-tao. On Fruits and Flaws of WEI Zi-yun's Studes of Chin Ping Mei[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2015, (7): 8-14.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2015.07.003

魏子云《金瓶梅》研究的成就与失误

On Fruits and Flaws of WEI Zi-yun's Studes of Chin Ping Mei

  • 摘要:魏子云是中国当代金瓶梅研究的开创者,成就卓著,也有失误。他是否定鲁迅一个权威论点的第一人。他认为早期的《金瓶梅》是讽谏明代万历神宗皇帝宠幸郑贵妃,有废长立幼故事的政治讽喻小说。似不确。这是他金瓶梅研究的核心观点。由此出发他考证的小说的时代背景、成书年代、初刻本问世年代等问题似有失偏颇。他以曲子“残红水上飘”是文学家李日华的作品,李活动在万历中晚期为证,认定《金瓶梅》成书于万历年间。其实他搞错了。作“残红水上飘”的是戏曲家李日华。此李日华活动在嘉靖年间,或更早。他认为《金瓶梅》传世的第一个信息出现在万历二十四年,不确。

    Abstract:As a pioneer of studying Chin Ping Mei in contemporary China, WEI Zi-yun had made notable achievements as well as some flaws. He was the first person who challenged one of LU Xun's authoritative views. He thought that the early novel Chin Ping Mei had satirized emperors Wanli and Shenzong of Ming Dynasty who doted on highest-ranking concubine ZHENG and deprived their eldest sons of rights to succeed the throne. This seemed uncertain and had become his core view of studying the novel. Based on this, the issues like the background, year of completion, publication of the first edition of the novel he solved did not seem so correct. He took as the evidence the lyrics Drifting Red on Water which was composed by LI Ri-hua who found his own activities in the middle and late years of Wanli. Accordingly, he thought that the novel had been completed in the years of Wanli. In fact, he was wrong. The author of Drifting Red on Water was in the period of Jiangjing or even earlier. Therefore, it is not correct that he thought the novel appeared in the 24 thyear of Wangli.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map