赖建权. 不同加工方式和伤害类型在道德判断中的差异[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (4): 102-105. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.04.022
引用本文: 赖建权. 不同加工方式和伤害类型在道德判断中的差异[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (4): 102-105.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.04.022
LAI Jian-quan. The Differences between Processing Methods and Damage Types in Moral Judgment[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (4): 102-105. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.04.022
Citation: LAI Jian-quan. The Differences between Processing Methods and Damage Types in Moral Judgment[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (4): 102-105.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.04.022

不同加工方式和伤害类型在道德判断中的差异

The Differences between Processing Methods and Damage Types in Moral Judgment

  • 摘要:以187名大学生为对象,通过问卷调查了不同加工方式和伤害类型在道德判断中的差异.结果发现,被试倾向认为物质损失比心理伤害更不道德,应该受到更严重的处罚.在加工方式上,直觉加工方式比分析加工方式认为心理伤害的行为更不道德,但两种加工方式在物质损失的行为评价上没有显著差异.

    Abstract:Through a questionnaire survey of 187 college students, this article examines the differences between processing methods and damage types in moral judgment. It is found that the testees believe that the material loss brings a far greater moral harm than a psychological damage; and in terms of processing approaches, compared with analytical processing approach, the intuitive processing approach thinks the psychological harm is more immoral.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map