谭春英. 非法证据排除规则范围及程序实证研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (5): 125-131. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.05.029
引用本文: 谭春英. 非法证据排除规则范围及程序实证研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (5): 125-131.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.05.029
TAN Chun-ying. An Empirical Study of Scope and Procedure ofExclusionary Ruleof Illegally Obtained Evidence[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (5): 125-131. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.05.029
Citation: TAN Chun-ying. An Empirical Study of Scope and Procedure ofExclusionary Ruleof Illegally Obtained Evidence[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (5): 125-131.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.05.029

非法证据排除规则范围及程序实证研究

An Empirical Study of Scope and Procedure ofExclusionary Ruleof Illegally Obtained Evidence

  • 摘要:以筛选的216份裁判文书为基础,从非法证据排除规则的申请理由、申请范围、公诉机关的举证、法院处理结果、与裁判结果的关系等司法实践出发,对非法证据排除规则的范围及程序进行分析和探讨。尤其对司法实践中较突出的重复性供述、侦查程序违法导致非法限制人身自由期间取得的供述及独立的非法证据排除审查程序提出了具有指导意义的建议。

    Abstract:With the selected 216 judgment documents as the basis, this paper has analyzed the scope and procedure of illegal evidence exclusion from some judicial practice like application reasons and scope for exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence, public execution organs' proof offering, courts' disposition, and relation with verdicts. And it especially has put forward some instructive suggestions to some typical judicial issues as repeated confession, confession obtained during the period when the party is deprived of freedom illegally caused by the illegal procedure of investigation, and the independent review procedure of the illegal evidence.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map