牛犇. 我国民事判决书改革新时期实践的实证研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2017, (5): 95-101. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2017.05.018
引用本文: 牛犇. 我国民事判决书改革新时期实践的实证研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2017, (5): 95-101.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2017.05.018
NIU Ben. An Empirical Study of Practice of Reform in Civil Judgment Papers in China in the New Era[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2017, (5): 95-101. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2017.05.018
Citation: NIU Ben. An Empirical Study of Practice of Reform in Civil Judgment Papers in China in the New Era[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2017, (5): 95-101.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2017.05.018

我国民事判决书改革新时期实践的实证研究

An Empirical Study of Practice of Reform in Civil Judgment Papers in China in the New Era

  • 摘要:新的《人民法院民事裁判文书制作规范》和《民事诉讼文书样式》公布实施,标志着我国民事裁判文书改革进入新的时期。 以最高人民法院制定这两个司法文件的原则精神和四大重点问题为线索,审视当下我国民事判决文书存在的不规范、形式化、行政化等顽疾,并在实证分析基础上从“二八定律”、执行效率的新视角探索当下民事判决书的繁简分流、规范化与个性化风格、杜绝带病上网等问题改革的新路径。

    Abstract:The publishing of New production Standards of People Courts’ civil Judgment Papers and Models of Civil Charging Documents marks the new period of our reform in civil judgment papers. According to clues of the principles of mak- ing these two documents by Supreme People’s Court and four important issues, this paper has examined the stubborn problems in China of the civil judgment papers including lack of standardization, formalization and administration. In addition, on the ba- sis of empirical analysis, it has probed into the new paths to reformation in civil judgment papers’ complicated and simple styles, standardization, individuation and eradication of uploading to internet with flaws from the new perspectives of“80/20 Rule” and enforcement efficiency.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map