黄一农“红学e考据”的歧路

Huang Yinong’s “E Textual Research into A Dream of Red Mansions” as Deviation

摘要

摘要:《枣窗闲笔》不可靠, 不可信, 不能用做红学的“文献”;黄一农将对《枣窗闲笔》的质疑与“程前脂后”混淆, 是对于红学研究方向的干扰。他提出的“红学e考据”, 基本没跳出“物”的圈子, 犯了见彼物不见此物、见物不见事、见物不见人、见物不见理的大忌。

Abstract:The work Casual Essays under Jujube Windowis not reliable and believable, and hence cannot be used as the“literature”for the study of A Dream of Red Mansions.Huang Yinong has confused his doubt in this work with the view of“Cheng’s comments preceding those of Zhiyanzhai”, which has disturbed the direction of such study.The“E textual research into A Dream of Red Mansions”has not jumped out the circle of“things”, in which this can be seen while that cannot, or things can be seen while man cannot, or things can be seen while truth cannot.