薛瑞兆. 以抄袭与造假而编织的一代进士名录(二)对李桂芝先生《辽金科举研究·金朝进士名录》“比较”的回应[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2018, (9): 37-43. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2018.09.007
引用本文: 薛瑞兆. 以抄袭与造假而编织的一代进士名录(二)对李桂芝先生《辽金科举研究·金朝进士名录》“比较”的回应[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2018, (9): 37-43.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2018.09.007
XUE Ruizhao. Lists Woven by Plagiarism and Forging of Successful Candidates in the Highest Imperial Examinations[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2018, (9): 37-43. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2018.09.007
Citation: XUE Ruizhao. Lists Woven by Plagiarism and Forging of Successful Candidates in the Highest Imperial Examinations[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2018, (9): 37-43.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2018.09.007

以抄袭与造假而编织的一代进士名录(二)对李桂芝先生《辽金科举研究·金朝进士名录》“比较”的回应

Lists Woven by Plagiarism and Forging of Successful Candidates in the Highest Imperial Examinations

  • 摘要:这篇论文从“无据著录”“重复著录”“著录种种非金进士”“著录事项颇多谬误”等四方面, 揭示李桂芝先生《金朝进士名录》存在的系统性问题, 以回应李桂芝先生检得“1825”名进士同薛瑞兆《金代科举》检得“1527”名进士之间的公开比较, 指出该录缺乏金代科举及相关文献研究的学术基础与修养, 涉嫌抄袭与造假。

    Abstract:To respond Mr.Li Guizhi’s public comparison between his 1, 825 successful candidates in the highest imperial examinations in Jin Dynasty and Xue Ruizhao’s statistics of 1, 527 candidates in Imperial Examinations in Jin Dynasty, this paper has revealed the current systematic problems from four aspects:record without basis, repeated record, record of those successful in other dynasties instead of Jin Dynasty, and various mistakes in record.It has pointed out that his record and textual research lacks the academic basis and achievement concerning the imperial examinations and the study of relevant literature.Therefore, his study is suspected of plagiarism and forging.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map