许亚桃, 吴立宝. 基于Delphi-AHP高中数学建模教学评价指标体系的研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2023, 38(2): 113-119. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.02.018
引用本文: 许亚桃, 吴立宝. 基于Delphi-AHP高中数学建模教学评价指标体系的研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2023, 38(2): 113-119.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.02.018
XU Yatao, WU Libao. On the evaluation index system of senior high mathematical modeling teaching based on Delphi-AHP approach[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2023, 38(2): 113-119. DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.02.018
Citation: XU Yatao, WU Libao. On the evaluation index system of senior high mathematical modeling teaching based on Delphi-AHP approach[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2023, 38(2): 113-119.DOI:10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.02.018

基于Delphi-AHP高中数学建模教学评价指标体系的研究

On the evaluation index system of senior high mathematical modeling teaching based on Delphi-AHP approach

  • 摘要:数学建模教学评价结果能够反映数学建模教学的优势与薄弱点,优化教师数学建模素养培养路径,实施有效的培训实践.从教学评价角度,采用德尔菲法和层次分析法,聚焦集中式教学构建高中数学建模教学评价指标体系,旨在为高中数学建模教学提供科学的评价工具.指标体系包括建模选题、教学监控、建模过程、合作学习、成果展示5个一级指标和相应的19个二级指标.从各指标权重来看,选题的适切性最为重要,提出问题次之,接着是选题的发展性、建立模型、选题的吸引力和明确分工.以上六项指标的权重均在0.05以上,占全部指标权重的50%.

    Abstract:The evaluation results through the mathematical modeling teaching evaluation can reflect the strengths and weaknesses of mathematical modeling teaching, and are thus helpful for optimizing the training path of teachers' mathematical modeling literacy, and therefore facilitating the implementation of effective training practices. From the perspective of teaching evaluation, the Delphi-AHP approach is used to focus on centralized teaching thus to construct the evaluation index system of high school mathematical modeling teaching, aiming to provide a scientific evaluation tool for high school mathematics modeling teaching. The index system includes 5 first-level indicators and 19 corresponding second-level indicators for modeling topic selection, teaching monitoring, modeling process, cooperative learning, and achievement demonstration. Judging by the weight of each index, the appropriateness of the topic chosen is the most important, following which are the presentation of questions, the expansibility of the topic, the establishment of the model, the attractiveness of the topic and the clear division of labor. The weights of the above six indicators are all greater than 0.05, accounting for 50% in the total weight of all the indexes.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map