温庆新. 对鲁迅“唐传奇”文类说的检讨 ——《中国小说史略》辨正(一)[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2011, (7): 43-47.
引用本文: 温庆新. 对鲁迅“唐传奇”文类说的检讨 ——《中国小说史略》辨正(一)[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2011, (7): 43-47.
WEN Qingxin. Lessons from LUN Xun’s Legendary Novels of Tang Dynasty: A Textual Research of A History of Chinese Novels[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2011, (7): 43-47.
Citation: WEN Qingxin. Lessons from LUN Xun’s Legendary Novels of Tang Dynasty: A Textual Research of A History of Chinese Novels[J].Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2011, (7): 43-47.

对鲁迅“唐传奇”文类说的检讨 ——《中国小说史略》辨正(一)

Lessons from LUN Xun’s Legendary Novels of Tang Dynasty: A Textual Research of A History of Chinese Novels

  • 摘要:在《中国小说史略》各修订本中,鲁迅对唐代小说的认识经历了“唐传奇体记传”、“唐传奇体记传”与“唐之传奇文”杂糅、“唐之传奇文”文类定名等三种变化情形,是对传统学术与西方文艺理论、史志目录思维与建构小说史体系之目的意图双重把握的不同认识阶段的表现。而前两种认识情形并不具备文体分类意义。后一种认识虽具备文体分类意义,却是在极力推崇西方文艺理论且试图消除传统学术之情况下形成的,存有以材料套框架、以理论隶文献等缺陷,非根植于唐人小说之实情。

    Abstract:In A History of Chinese Novels, LU Xun’s understanding of Tang novels had undergone novels of the legendary style, combination of legendary-style ones and tales of marvels, and tales of marvels of Tang Dynasty, which shows his different understanding of traditional academic thoughts, Western literary theories, categories of historical records and the intention for constructing system of novel history. The former two are not significant in categorization of styles, while the latter one is, which it is in an attempt to canonize the Western literary theories and remove the traditional academic thoughts. And it has some defects of using material to fill in the frame and slaving theories to document, and it is not rooted in the Tang novels.

/

    返回文章
    返回
      Baidu
      map