LIU Hongqiang, ZHANG Huiling. Textual Criticism on TANG Menglai’s Son-in-law in Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio Base on County Annals of Qingcheng[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2023, 38(11): 1-8. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.11.001
Citation: LIU Hongqiang, ZHANG Huiling. Textual Criticism on TANG Menglai’s Son-in-law in Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio Base on County Annals of Qingcheng[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2023, 38(11): 1-8. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.11.001

Textual Criticism on TANG Menglai’s Son-in-law inStrange Tales from a Chinese StudioBase onCounty Annals of Qingcheng

  • Since the Kangxi Regime of the Qing Dynasty, there have been records in literature about TANG Menglai selecting a prodigy from Qingzhou as his son-in-law. It was also rumored that this incident was recorded in Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio. However, none of the existing versions of Strange Tales from a Chinese Studiocurrently include TANG’s story. After close examination, it has been verified that TANG did take a prodigy as his son-in-law, and it is unlikely that this event was ever recorded in Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio. The belief that the book included the story of TANG selecting a son-in-law most likely stems from the misconception of people mistaking Autumn Lantern Clusterfor Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

      Return
      Return
        Baidu
        map